epsrc new investigator award example epsrc new investigator award example

This should reflect your overall conclusion, and should be consistent with your comments on the individual sections of your review, taking account of all the assessment criteria and the various weightings you applied. CAREER "Utilization of Mechanochemistry for the Minimization of Solvent Waste" National Science . They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles. Requests for travel both domestically and internationally could be included in accordance with the relevant scheme guidelines, noting the above advice. Posts responsible for: None. The aim of the scheme is to support them in establishing a research group and developing their own research vision. You will be asked to provide the following information: You are not required to have finalised all the details of your application by the time the intention to submit is made. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. If a studentship is aligned in this way, it should be clear in the case for support and work plan how the work of the student will both contribute to the project and ensure successful completion of the students PhD. Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. For example: The research councils Code of Conduct and policy on the governance of good research conduct outlines the expectation that applicants for research council funding are expected to observe the highest standards of integrity, honesty and professionalism and to embed good practice in every aspect of their work. Fewer quotes are acceptable if justification is provided in the justification of resources. To solve these worldwide issues, the UK becomes the first major economy to pass the net-zero emissions law. 15 Customer reviews. The study, published in PLOS ONE, brought together researchers and clinicians at UCL Engineering, UCLH and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana to investigate a new non-invasive diagnostic technique using smartphone photographs of the eye and face. Case for support. Customer Reviews. The NIA expectations documentgives some guidelines for applicants to consider during the initial formulation of their proposals with regards to the expected scope and features of their application. This application is scientifically or technically flawed, This application does not meet one or more of the assessment criteria, This application meets all assessment criteria but with clear weaknesses, This is a good application that meets all assessment criteria but with minor weaknesses, This is a strong application that broadly meets all assessment criteria. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. It is also assessed on applicant and partnerships (secondary), resources and management (secondary) and host organisation support (secondary). This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. You should comment explicitly on this aspect of the proposal and where possible give your view of where this work would sit in relation to related activity internationally, and the extent to which it would provide the UK with a unique capability. the applicant and wider teams ability to deliver the project through to the creation of impact. an early career researcher who meets the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. Impact can take many forms over widely varying timescales. If not, is there a clear and realistic plan to target potential beneficiaries of the outputs and outcomes? Post base: Office-based/Non Office-based (see job hazard analysis) Job purpose. Before writing your application, look at some grant records on these pages to see what information would be in the public domain. The research excellence of the proposal, making reference to: The ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: The effectiveness of the proposed planning and management and whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified, making reference to: Feedback will not be provided following the prioritisation panel meeting. Planning for activities that maximise the likelihood of any identified impacts occurring is a vital part of research. Applicants who have previously applied for a New Investigator Award, successful or unsuccessful, but otherwise still satisfy the other New Investigator Award eligibility criteria are still eligible to apply to this funding opportunity. Can be applied for without holding an academic position. However, unless there are exceptional reasons why an organisation cannot meet the requirements to be a project partner, EPSRC will not accept letters of support. Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. hold a fixed-term contract that extends beyond the duration of the proposed research project, and the host research organisation is prepared to give you all the support normal for a permanent employee. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - Get Started Instantly. (15) The Development of Solvent-Free Reductions via . https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/what-to-include-in-your-proposal/overview-of-information-needed-for-your-proposal, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system, preparing new proposals in light of EPSRCs policy on resubmissions, what makes a good project partner letter of support, how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance, Overview of information needed for your proposal, case for support totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. * SFI (Ireland) FNR . It is important that EPSRC funds are used ethically and responsibly. To find the opportunity, search for: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants. acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. The NIA scheme can only be applied to once, whether previous applications were successful or not, except when permission to resubmit an application is invited after peer review. Where two or more applications have been formally linked to form a single research project, you are requested to submit a single review covering the project as a whole. You should hear the result of your application within 26 weeks of submission by your host organisation. 1423 . You will have a chance to provide a response to the assessment, which will be considered in the ranking of the proposal. 00. It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. We would expect this to form part of the university support letter. As an internationally collaborative grant, particular attention should be paid to standard conditions 2.6.1 and 2.6.2. The best experts are ready to do your dissertation from scratch and guarantee the best result. Instead, they should describe the impacts on an individuals track record and career development. Find out more about providing declarations of interest. Reviewers are not required to consider this additional information when providing comments on an application. Projects should be self-contained and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. Whether they are successful or unsuccessful, applicants who apply for an early career researcher international collaboration grant are still eligible to apply for a New Investigator Award. Your assessment should be based solely on the resources sought and not on the costs derived from them. This document is the principal opportunity to explain to reviewers . Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . Find out more about writing a justification of resources. As such, the focus should be on the stated impact rather than the duration. To undertake research on an EPSRC funded project targeting the integration of electronic and silicon photonic components. Submissions to this funding opportunity will count towards the EPSRC repeatedly unsuccessful applicants policy. The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. The reviewer form asks reviewers to score their confidence as low, medium or high. Select 'call search'. For general queries about EPSRC new investigator awards, please contact: Sign up for news, views, events and funding alerts. Research has the ability to not only produce understanding, knowledge and value, but also unintended consequences, questions, ethical dilemmas and, at times, unexpected social transformations. whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. the ideas, concepts and approaches proposed and any particularly strong or weak examples within the programme, whether the applicant has provided clear aims and objectives for the technical programme, and how they will monitor their achievements. UKRI is implementing a standard method for inputting overseas costs on Je-S from 1 July 2021. You and your international partners may have a previous relationship, but we do not expect you to have worked together extensively. Your project should typically last one to three years. For more information on these EPSRC funding calls, visit the website >>. Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. The scheme aims to support them in establishing a research group and developing their research vision. Position type Full time, fixed term. Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . Nursing Management Business and Economics History +104. NIA provide foundational funds to initiate a research group. Please select the Lead Agency agreement under which you wish to apply. Letters should be project relevant, written by project partners when the proposal is being prepared, and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. Include how the research: Reviewers are requested to comment on the applicants ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: Appropriateness of the track record of the applicant(s): Balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators: Applicants are required to identify all resources required to undertake the project, and to clearly justify the request. EPSRC have this week re-launched their grant funding scheme targeted specifically at Early Career Researchers. For visiting researchers, include details of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. This will help applicants build an in-depth knowledge of our peer review processes and principles, helping you to further increase your knowledge of reviewing and proposal writing. We will use this information to help plan the proposal assessment, for example to understand expected submission levels and the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit. Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. Investigators must be academic employees (lecturer or equivalent) of an eligible organisation. Press release issued: 11 March 2020. EPSRC Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council : Start: 01-01-2022 / End: 31-12-2024 : Amount: 392,388: SEMS Division: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics and Design. Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. New Investigator Awards are aimed at helping early career academics initiate their own independent research programme. Institutions are required to offer a high level of support to fellows. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas. Capitalising on clusters of design excellence, Green Transition Ecosystems (GTEs) are large scale projects that focus on translating the best design-led research into real-world benefits. Find out about the international development funding route. The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. Please leave enough time for your proposal to pass through your organisations Je-S submission route before this date. F.D.G. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Therefore, you should not use journal impact factor (or any hierarchy of journals), conference rankings and metrics such as the H-index or i10-index when assessing UKRI grants. Reviewers should comment on how the research relates to EPSRCs research areas and strategies (many projects will be relevant to more than one EPSRC research area) and complements EPSRCs current portfolio. When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should consider the unequal impacts of the impact that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the track record and career development of those individuals included in the proposal, and you should focus on the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing. whether the applicant has considered responsible innovation in their research programme. NIA1: Acceptance to the Scheme. Research grants are open to: . All relevant parts of the ethical information section must be completed. The content of a paper is more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published, especially for early-stage investigators. Some funding opportunities may have specific requirements, which will be described in the funding opportunity. Summary. EPSRC cannot advise on which scheme is likely to be suitable. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project suitability guidance. A project partner letter of support, from each project partner listed, must be included as an attachment. whether the proposal demonstrates that the applicants have the expertise and capabilities to deliver the project. covering letter describing how your experience and career history fit with the guidance on eligibility: not seen by peer review, no page limit. Please provide as full a response as you believe you are qualified to. New Investigator Award: Starts: 01 February 2020: Ends: 31 January 2022: Value (): 246,055: EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: Mathematical Analysis: EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: No relevance to Underpinning Sectors: Related Grants: . This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. You should provide your overall assessment of the application. The experiments ar The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. 3 members of the panel, introducers, will be asked to assess each of the projects. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. Download the New Investigator peer review form. . We are always open for applications for new investigator awards. 2021. Date posted 2 March 2023. . EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. NERC - the Natural Environment Research Council Swindon. Creating a Full Proposal and Electronic Submission. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. EPSRC has up to 5,000,000 to spend on the 2 funding routes of this funding opportunity, including: You may apply for up to 200,000 at 100% full economic costs with a duration of up to 2 years. Find out more about what to include in the case for support. A full justification for your assessment of the application should be provided. Best Paper Award at the Civil Engineering Research in Ireland (CERI) conference August 2022. All these approaches could demonstrate excellence so your judgement should not simply be based on which approach has been adopted. Complete the intention to submit form on Smart Survey. You must apply using the Joint Electronic Submission system (Je-S) . case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. We will award 80% of the full economic costs of the project, and your organisation must agree to find the balance. The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap that has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. You will be a part of the decision-making process and get a broad view of the novel ideas coming through the funding pipeline in your area. See the Je-S handbook for full advice on completing applications. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . seek to assess tangibility of deliverables, direct return on investment or detailed routes to exploitation impact is not synonymous with early exploitation. Find out more about completing your application. If youre applying through the New Investigator Award scheme, you should attach a statement from your host university, typically your head of department describe the universitys commitment to your research career development, and confirm your appointment details and period of probation if relevant. For example, we often have . You can request funds for anything eligible under standard EPSRC rules. Under the NIA scheme, funding is typically sought for 10% to 20% of the principal investigators time. Americas. If you plan to use a major facility in your research, such as those funded centrally by EPSRC or a European facility, contact the facility before applying to EPSRC to check if your proposed research is feasible, and obtain a technical assessment if Je-S marks it as required. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . The applicant could present a programme where they are moving into a new discipline, or the programme could bring together expertise and approaches from different disciplines, and in partnership with external organisations. The scheme only supports UK research organisations, with grants ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 full Economic Cost (fEC) can be awarded. We recommend that all attachments are uploaded into Je-S as Adobe Acrobat files (PDF) as uploading word documents can result in layout changes to the document. This provides unprecedented nove Search A certified document that proves 100% content originality. We do not ask peer review to comment on eligibility. Your application must also include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDF documents to avoid errors. Grants are awarded under the standard UK Research and Innovation grant terms and conditions. call/type/mode: Early Career Researchers International Collaboration Grants, case for support (8 pages, 2 on your track record and 6 on the scientific case). The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. stream 2 (for established or mature clusters): estimate 3 to 5 awards with maximum 5 million per award, over 4 years; Standard EPSRC eligibility rules apply. You should comment on how well this has been done and on the appropriateness of the resources requested. Researchers at UCL and University of Ghana have successfully predicted whether children have anaemia using only a set of smartphone images. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. The ESRC New Investigators Grant is a relatively new scheme for early career researchers who want to become a principal investigator (PI) and work on an independent piece of research. The Operations Manager will work closely with Investigators aligned to the NIHR BRC Theme in Infection and AMR (led by Professors Graham Cooke and Wendy Barclay) and will include developing clinical. Typical examples are the production of ammonia, which is a process that needs to be catalysed by iron, or the production . Site is running on IP address 149.155.59.247, host name 149-155-59-247.uksbs.co.uk ( United Kingdom ) ping response time 10ms Excellent ping . The application should clearly demonstrate the methodology the applicants intend to use to attain their stated objectives, and you should comment on how clearly these are described, how appropriate they are for the planned activity, and their scientific or technical feasibility. Customer Reviews. Impact acceleration account (IAA) is a strategic award that provides funding to Queen's University for a wide range of impact activities. HiDRA (Hierarchical Deep Representations of Anatomy) will address these challenges by developing a "multi-view-multi-task" approach that is . Equipment over 10,000 in value (including VAT) is not available through this funding opportunity. Thoroughly researched, expertly written, and styled accordingly. You will be given 2 weeks to provide a response to the questions raised by the introducers. This is one of a number of options offered by EPSRC for researchers seeking to establish their career, including fellowships, managed calls, and responsive mode. . Smaller items of equipment (individually under 10,000) should be in the Directly Incurred Other Costs heading. . Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. The outcome of the application will not affect the applicants eligibility to apply for the NIA scheme. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap which has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. This will populate: council: EPSRC; document type: standard proposal; scheme: standard This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. There is no page limit for the Je-S attachment, but a maximum of three letters is permitted and letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. The applicant is not expected to predict the impact of their research in terms of value, reach or significance, and therefore assessors should not: Drawing upon what the applicant has said, reviewers should comment on: The extent to which each bullet point is addressed will depend on the nature of the research proposed. Think of this as your report to the prioritisation panel, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses you identified in the individual questions and then making a clear and explicit recommendation about whether or not you believe the application warrants funding. EPSRC is fully committed to develop and promote responsible innovation. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. Find out more aboutourpathway for change. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Information provided as part of the intention to submit will not formally assessed. A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. The UK research organisation should include estate costs and indirect costs for any visiting researcher regardless of whether the support being requested includes a salary contribution or is only travel and subsistence. how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. Your application is assessed by peer review. CVs, not exceeding two A4 sides each, should be submitted as separate attachments using Attachment Type CV in Je-S, and are only required for named research staff or visiting researchers. You should also consider that this unequal impact may continue beyond the return to work. It is expected that most proposals will have the potential to deliver some form of non-academic impact.