Shop the best selection of alpine touring bindings at Backcountry.com, where you'll find premium outdoor gear and clothing and experts to guide you through selection. We’re planning on a long-term review after he’s done using them for the winter, so we’ll see about the wear issue. The F10 is an alpine touring binding for those looking for a very light all-day touring setup with solid downhill performance. Details here: Weight, however, is of course the enemy if you’re earning your turns. The Tour F12 in size small (265-325mm boot) with 110mm ski brakes weighs in at a Fritschi-competitive 4.49 pounds per pair. The tried and tested Marker touring design has been updated and beefed up to offer maximum performance with minimal weight. Sorry if I gave you the impression that I only skied from crash to crash. I know Fritchi is upgrading their binding for next season, but I did not ski it so I will perhaps unfairly compare it to the current Plus. For example, its EPF Extended Power Frame is found on the Duke and Baron for crazy-efficient power transmission on fatter skis. The binding did not release until I had collapsed the boot (Megaride). Marker Tour F 12/10 frame underside, 2011 ... recommend the new version and hope it tests out well enough for a full review just as soon as we get it on snow. I also have play in the front pivot plastic bush, after around 30 days of touring… They feel very stiff and responsive in downhill mode though…, I really think the problem with the metal on plastic wear is a serious safety hazard. The front binding developed tons of slop around the pin which the binding the rotates around while skinning. (i mean screw holes..). Wednesday, December 4, 2013. (6” 160lbs small cliffs only), Good things take time. Le migliori offerte per Marker Tour F10 in Scarponi e Attacchi sul primo comparatore italiano. The Royal Family bindings that define the standard of modern freeskiing. Nope. Marker makes several frame-style tour bindings and I was not ready to shell out the coin for bindings that release at 12 and weigh more than the skis they are attached to. The climbing bars are easier to use than the Duke, but still latch under the plate, and are not as easy to use as a Freeride. And it features the same Backcountry Technology … I ski about 50% backcountry (mostly heli-skiing) and 50% in resort. I actually had several ankle joint impingement injuries when I used to bump ski aggressively — in stiff alpine boots. It’s common in skiing leg injuries to immediately think the binding is at cause. I’ve never cared about the so-called slop, but for some it is a serious consideration. Marker Duke PT 16. For example, its EPF Extended Power Frame is found on the Duke and Baron for crazy-efficient power transmission on fatter skis. I recommend this product. Note! Downhill Skiing review. These ski very well. The toe is constructed to get the most power transmission possible from a lightweight design. Was trying to decide on my first touring binding between Dukes and Barons and then I found out about F10/12s. Want a very light, all-day touring setup with solid all-mountain performance? Rating. 1 reviews, rating 2. Data sheet. Anyone seen this? I’ve now heard from two testers of this binding that they have had significant issues with heel alignment while touring on sidehills. Lastly, I’m a firm believer that tech bindings provide a very good safety release provided they’re carefully set and not skied locked, but every binding with a different release machinery is going to have some angles of release that are better, and some that are worse. I tour/ski about 25-40 hours a week and have never had so many problems until I mounted the Marker Tour F12?s. Uphill performance is ok. I just bought a pair of k2 obsetheds recently and want to put a pair of touring bindings on them. I’m going to test ski a pair of these in the next day or two. If the boot cuffs are softer, the boot will collapse before applying upward pressure to the pins and it may not release. Viktor, as long as you have a screwdriver available, you’re good to go! Yes, it sounds like these bindings when used for much uphill have a durability issue that involves the walking pivot. 9 reviews, rating 2.6. 5 . As for alpine bindings allowing the boot to move forward in a release, if you think that you have a poor understanding of alpine bindings. I may get a new pair of Peace Pipes from RAMP (http://www.rampsports.com/store/skis/unisex/peace-pipe-56.html) and want to put a new AT binding on them. Bigfoot Snowshoes ADV Adventure Series Review, Min - max boot sole length (mm) / S 264 - 327 mm, L 304 - 367 mm, Adult, standard Alpine, GripWalk Adult, Touring Boots, Must remove boots to switch from skin to ski modes. What do you think? Mar 24, 2014 By: Ryan Dunfee Follow. Focusing on producing the right binding for the end user is Marker’s DNA. I didn’t write to whine. Marker's Triple Pivot Light Toe is a lightweight toe piece with a horizontal spring. Probably easy to remedy so watch your bindings and return on warranty if they have undue wear, and I’d imagine next year’s will be improved. Focusing on producing the right binding for the end user is Marker’s DNA. For the skier who wants a very light all-day touring setup with solid all-mountain performance, the Tour 10 features a DIN range of 3-10, making it a great choice for lighter weight skiers. July 14, 2016. Marker … Marker F10 Tour Black/White 2021 The perfect choice for the touring skier who doesn‘t accept any compromise when it comes to weight, handling and reliability. With this information, we talked through what might be happening. Mike, we’ll be doing a torque test next week. Designed for the skier looking forward to the descent as much as the ascent and a general focus on light weight. The technology is called ID and what it does is that you can adjust it to fit different type ski boot … Hard to say, I never ski my Dukes with anything other than an alpine boot, and they are mounted on obSETHed, so tough to compare. I have to wonder if that got left out of the manufacturing specs, as Marker has test machine that cycles the bindings thousands of times to pick up on this type of wear. Flex test will come sooner or later, I’ll just compare to Duke…. The Tour F12 in size small (265-325mm boot) with 110mm ski brakes weighs in at a Fritschi-competitive 4.49 pounds per pair. It snapped at the “more natural pivot point”. This worked better than I thought, and seemed pretty solid. He’s a good guy with an inquisitive mind, total ski geek, so we were able to talk through the whole situation. Never heard of a Duke breaking. Marker Alpine Bindings Collection 2020/21 for Race, All Mountain, Freeride/Freestyle and Touring . Note: the stance on the FT felt very neutral just like a Freeride or a Duke. Marker Tour heel lifter foot has small notches that mate with the red bumps. In … Marker Duke. We each have our own comfort zone, and I’m stuck in mine. Still not ready to only have a Dynafit-setup, even though I’m probably 75% touring (50-60 total ski days a year). The Tour F10 puts a lightweight alpine toe and heel piece together with a touring baseplate. However, I would imagine the Duke would ski better just by being heavier. 2 . 1-855-485-8180 . If it is piste and some day trips that you anticiapte I think they will be OK. Submit Review. http://knowledgebase.porterstahoe.com/2011-marker-tour-f12-and-f10/, http://www.rampsports.com/store/skis/unisex/peace-pipe-56.html, http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb271/x-skier/marker_tour_problem.jpg, http://www.wildsnow.com/6034/marker-f12-f10-review/, Ski Touring News Review February 2021 — Backcountry.dot.com, Critters, Shark Tank, more, Food for Thought: On Slopes Above 25 Degrees, THINK, Skis From the Future — 2021/22 Is All About the Freeride, An Education on the Ephemeral Glide — Bases, Wax and DPS Phantom, A Carbon Fibre Freeride Boot? Find a dealer 0 Favorites; English. Mark, I didn’t take it as a whine, it just sounded like you guys were reaching a bit. In particular, test how the step-in function works. Latest weighs about an ounce less. Don’t need the superlite as not into randonee racing…way too lazy for that. 4: Marker 6.2. Shane; yes, it does. Free shipping. This comparison is my personal opinion based on the experience what we had with the bindings.I skied all this bindings on different skis. Look at the heel on the Baron/Duke v. F10/F12 — whatever other subtle material differences might exist, the heel unit is obviously a much drastically different design. I probably should have stated right up front that I take full responsibility for my injury. I am presuming there will be a warranty replacement, but does anyone know if the durability issue has been fixed, if not I will go for a different binding. I’m not sure that I will get back on these bindings at this point, but will probably return to a binding that has been successful in the past. Marker’s F10 Tour is an ideal entry level touring binding that can offer years of great performance. @2020 - All Rights Reserved. More, the very nature of how the Duke/F10/12 binding is latched to the ski makes for a much more solid connection. The F10 Tour binding from Marker is made with a strong focus on the end user. However the largest brake size for the tour f10/f12 is 110 mm and underfoot the k2 obsetheds are 117 mm. Anyways, was considering the F12 after being pleased with the Dukes but the last few posts seem scary. From Canada. Louie has the 2011/12 model of the FT and is testing. Subito a casa, in tutta sicurezza. This is another binding that Marker adapted from a true alpine binding, and it shows. WRITE A REVIEW OF THE 2021 Marker F10 Tour AT Bindings. While I’ve never had any problems skiing at a resort with those DF bindings, they do seem a little light weight for resort skiing and I’m hoping that the Marker F12 Tours might help with that concern. The Marker F10 Tour bindings get you into ski touring, while offering years of great performance. The Tour F10 is an AT binding for the skier who wants a very light all-day Marker Tour F10 … Somehow in the powder it’s just good fun! Marker Tour F10 AT Binding Black/White/Red, LG/90mm. Bottom line is that I have skied a lot and crashed a lot (it kind of goes together). That is one possible advantage, but not a big one in my opinion as Freeride does fine for zillions of skiers. Lou. Original model F-12 we have (early 2010 vintage) weighs in at 36.7 oz (1040 gr). Plus my boots aren't Dynafit compatible. Another possible advantage is more durability, especially for lots of lift served days. Focusing on producing the right binding for the end user is in Marker’s DNA. And I’m right there with you on the falling. Mine ones broke right behind the AFD, in touring mode, one in deep, heavy snow and another when a friend fell in front (again, in touring mode). Marker's Tour F10 is a lightweight touring binding that incorporates well thought-out features with excellent downhill ability. I think I’ve the same problem as described here in some posts. Marker F10 Tour Ski Bindings Black/White 90mm Great entry level touring binding with solid all-mountain performance. For the skier who wants a very light all-day touring setup with solid all-mountain performance, the Tour 10 features a DIN range of 3-10, making it a great choice for lighter weight skiers. After last year, I’d wait till consumer and other testing goes on for a few months. On the other hand, please know that one binding can’t always do everything…. Oh well. MARKER Kingpin vs. Fritschi Vipec12 vs. MARKER tour F12 EPF . Even so, I probably should have left it out! Considering a return of the bindings actually…maybe I’ll change to Onyx? DEALER LOGIN. Amazing the force that skiing can apply to a boot and subsequently your body…. It’s totally obvious that these bindings “wears out” rather quickly when used for skinning. Is this true. I know the weight difference might seem like peanuts overall with a ski that big/heavy, but if I can get away with it why not? And it features the same Backcountry Technology … 4 . It’s a safety-touring binding that develops a potentially dangerous dysfunction by being used for what it’s designed to be used for. Posted on 12:00 AM by Unknown. I quick search reveals 113mm Marker ski crampons for sale. The bindings obviously need a bushing that prevent metal on plastic wear. New version for 2011/2012 has a vastly improved pivot and some other improvements. For now my “skiing” consists of supporting my Doc really well. Name: Email Address: Message: … In other words they were not really a step-in. Monty, do you tend to break bindings? Everyone probably has a different opinion of how that style would look, but it’s definitely something to consider. This is not a really good test as DIN settings don’t mean anything on AT boots & bindings, but it provided a benchmark. I don’t think it’ll be noticeable, but maybe in the long run? Review is a comin’ once we really work the things. EXTRANET. Wow lots of info.. Any advice is appreciated! I was touring in the F12s yesterday and broke my second Tour binding for the year with a knee forward in tour mode. In a straight ahead impact like I experienced, those would open slightly and release the heel as I described. For the skier who wants a very light all-day touring setup with solid all-mountain performance, the Tour 10 features a DIN range of 3-10, making it a great choice for lighter weight skiers. While I think the latter two are solid designs, the Tour seems to be a little too light up for my taste. This text has been translated by Google Translate. Dotato del nuovissimo Triple Pivot Light Toe e del tallone Hollow Linkage, l’F10 Tour è la scelta perfetta per tutti gli sciatori di fondo che non vogliono scendere a compromessi quando si tratta di peso, maneggevolezza e affidabilità. The Marker Tour F12 Alpine Touring binding may have left its resort-loving brothers and sisters in favor of fresh, backcountry lines, but it still bears the crest and bloodline of the Marker Royal Family. Username. It‚s engineered to be a lighter weight version of the Tour12 for skiers who do not need a DIN of 12 or an overly stiff touring plate. I went skiing with a binding that had considerable slop in the front binding around the pin and did a hard slash turn to avoid crashing in a tree, and the boot just slid out of the binding. Here is a review I posted on another site. Touch device users, explore by touch or with swipe gestures. Marker promised added heellift, but it could have been even higher. Focusing on producing the right binding for the end user is Marker’s DNA. 160lbs, 5’7″, All, we didn’t do extended review of 2010/2011 model of FT 10 and 12 due to concerns with pivot wear. In a single season this will be the second pair of Marker Tours I have broken. Got new bindings on warranty, but traded them in with Onyx. I got these bindings for this year’s setup, but they only managed to hold up for 3 months of skiing and skinning. The Marker Tour F10 is a staple in the lightweight frame touring bindings market. Downhill performance was very good. We both found them to be a very nice binding to ski. Isn’t the Dynafit binding the FT12 and the marker binding the F12? NEWSROOM. The great thing about Marker Duke, Baron, and Tour bindings is that they come with an adhesive mounting template as shown below. My son has a pair of these bindings in play, but does have them on swap plates and tends to go to his tech bindings for extended uphilling. I agree that the Tour bindings are not the best choice for everyday resort use; only the Duke/Barron really seem to pull that one off. Marker's F10 Tour is an ideal entry level touring binding that can offer years of great performance. Home; Home » Binding » Black/White/Red » LG/90mm » Marker » Tour » Marker Tour F10 AT Binding Black/White/Red, LG/90mm. The crampon goes up and down with your foot but cannot be used at the same time as the heel lifters . The F12s seem like a good choice, but I’m going to be using technica alpine boots until I can afford a pair of touring boots. Thanks for the conversation, Lou. 2 . 1 reviews. Sorry Lou for going off topic again, I have a habit of this. I ski aggressively, weigh 185lbs, and like to drop 30 footers. The binding comes … I thought I was loosing it more than I am. All of Marker's AT technology is packed into the Tour F12 to ensure the ultimate experience and performance off-trail and through the backcountry. 1 . MARKER F10 TOUR BLACK/WHITE 2021 Marker's F10 Tour is an ideal entry level touring binding that can offer years of great performance. So, you fancy chucking your Marker royal family bindings on some wide sticks? But when I did ski downhill bindings, I used both Solomon and Marker. This binding is made with hight adjustable AFD-plate (Anti Friction Device). At Marker, it's all about having the descent of a lifetime. Marker F10 Tour bindings get you into ski touring, while offering years of great performance. Strenghts: Stable Weaknesses: To top it up, it is uneasy, heavy and uncomfortable to join. Tanto leggero, quanto resistente! I’ve researched Barons and found a couple (only a couple) of guys in other forums who broke off toe piece chunks. — Pierre Gignoux Mountain Review, Celebrating the Low Danger, Low Angle Ski Tour, Cooke City in Photos — Montana Trip Report, Six Who Dared — Elk Mountains Traverse & Richard Compton Tribute, Drinking Beer with the Bench Girls — Totally Deep Podcast 84, Griffin Post Stays Home — Totally Deep Podcast 83, Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z, Warm Toes for Cold Smoke — Tips To Keep Your Feet Toasty, 10 Essential Mistakes for the Backcountry Ski Touring Beginner, Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A. The Marker Tour F10 ski touring binding is a perfect choice for beginners and ambitious skiers alike. I will be using a Alpine touring boot for backcountry but also want to use my alpine boot when I ski resort. I got these for my new quiver of one skis. He is not a big or agressive skier, and doesn’t jump off cliffs – buit does spend a lot of time on his skis naturally. 2.0. Marker Alpine Bindings Collection ... F10 TOUR S (100 mm) F10 TOUR L (100 mm) Load more. Source: bought it new They helped release the toe in a twisting fall. Nonetheless, he does tour the Marker. Now we’ve gotten both versions of F 12 on the scale for the reality show. Lou did you get any news about new Marker Tour F12 bindings? I have worked in a tune shop for about 5 years and ski in the backcountry…I’ve tried the fritchis and thought they were right down there with the naxos as far as performance, durability, and touring. Select country / language Europe. Qualified orders eligible for FREE S&H and FREE RETURNS. Overall, I really like the Tour. (besides the obvious DIN) For example if I ski at a 9 DIN, will the F12s hold better against release? Light-ish frame style tour binding for the rest of us. That’ll be great Max, get back soon with your take! (All weights with screws and brakes.). I was interested to see the below link after I had purchased. Subito a casa, in tutta sicurezza. I doubt that was the intent of the design, but that was the result. I could clearly see that that the plastic around the pin had been “ovalized”. Oh, and back to the boot, you are correct that a boot that’s soft in forward support can contribute to certain types of ankle injuries (such as impingement and tendon ruptures). Have a Question or Need to book a fitting. My Account. Marker's F10 Tour is an ideal entry level touring binding that can offer years of great performance. Secondary, you’d have to be a binding engineer to figure out if alpine bindings really have a function that helps release the boot in a direct forward force situation, with no side twist and no heel lift. (The only thing that might make this a problem is if you are at the low end of a small binding and your friend is at the high end of a large binding). Most of my skiing is done in Hokkaido, Japan which is powder heaven and the need to exit is a pain in the butt. A height adjustable gliding AFD is designed for AT boots but will accommodate WTR, GripWalk and Alpine boots.